Prediction of Tim Van Rijthoven [871st] vs Tomas Machac [20th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan

Form
W L L W L L L L L L
Form
W W W W W L W W W LH2H: Rijthoven 1 - 1 Machac
They have played 4 sets in total, with Rijthoven winning 2 and Machac winning 2. The last match between Rijthoven and Machac was at the Forli 5 Challenger, 25-02-2022, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Tim Van Rijthoven getting the victory 6-3 7-6(5).
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Tim Van Rijthoven | 1 |
Tomas Machac | 1 |
Rijthoven | Stats | Machac |
---|---|---|
0% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 71% (15-6) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
871 | Ranking | 20 |
101 | Highest Rank | 20 |
27 | Age | 24 |
R | Plays | R |
9 | Titles | 11 |
62% (234-146) | Career Total W/L | 66% (273-138) |
$499,600 | Career Prize Money | $3,180,290 |
0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 7-6(5) |
![]() ![]()
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Tomas Machac
65%
(
55 of
84)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
14
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
||||
6-3 6-3 |
![]() ![]()
Tomas Machac
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
79%
(
38 of
48)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
44
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
2 | Sets Won | 2 |
19 | Games Won | 21 |
17 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
3 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
1:24:45 | Average Match Time | 1:24:45 |
70% (93/132) | 1st Serve % | 55% (72/130) |
71% (66/93) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (53/72) |
38% (15/39) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (29/58) |
40% (4/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 35% (6/17) |
37% (48/130) | Return Points Win % | 39% (51/132) |
50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tim Van Rijthoven vs Tomas Machac Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Rijthoven 1 - 1 Machac
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Rijthoven has won 33.33% of points on their second serve, while Machac has won 47.39%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Rijthoven, in recent form, has won 41.18% of their opponent's second serve points, while Machac has won 46.28%. The same stats for first serve returns are 14.29% and 21.62% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Rijthoven has saved 50% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Machac has saved 49.42% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Rijthoven has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 5), with Machac winning 62.3% (W/L 38/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Rijthoven has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 80/ 43), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 61/ 47). Machac has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 69% (W/L 83/ 37), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 6/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Rijthoven has played most of their matches on the Grand Slam, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 3), where as Machac has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 68.97% of matches (W/L 20/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Rijthoven winning 1 times and Machac being victorious 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Rijthoven winning 2 and Machac winning 2. The last match between Rijthoven and Machac was at the Forli 5 Challenger, 25-02-2022, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Tim Van Rijthoven getting the victory 6-3 7-6(5).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:24:45.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Rijthoven and Machac have played a deciding set 0 times, with Rijthoven winning 0 times and Machac 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Rijthoven winning 1, and Machac 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Rijthoven has played against opponents with an average rank of 182.2 while Machac has played against players with an average rank of 62.11.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Rijthoven has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Machac has won 65% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Rijthoven has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Machac has converted 34.82% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Tim Van Rijthoven Recent Matches Played
Before:
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Jerome Kym
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
20 of
35)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
53
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Kyrian Jacquet
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
46%
(
27 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
5
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
4
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Manuel Guinard
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
54%
(
43 of
79)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
89)
9
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
3
86%
(
37 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
20 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
89)
92
Total Points Won
76
|
6-7(4) 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
71%
(
75 of
105)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
8
Aces
14
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
60 of
75)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
45 of
54)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
24%
(
25 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
24%
(
21 of
86)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(6) 7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Zizou Bergs
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Maxime Cressy
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
57%
(
52 of
91)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
21
Aces
13
7
Double Faults
3
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve Won
89%
(
42 of
47)
69%
(
27 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
21 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
22%
(
16 of
74)
86
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 6-7(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Rubber 2 |
![]() ![]()
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Alex Molcan
69%
(
73 of
106)
1st Serve %
68%
(
86 of
126)
27
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
4
79%
(
58 of
73)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
61 of
86)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
13%
(
2 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
28%
(
30 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
47 of
126)
123
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(6) 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Leandro Riedi
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
48
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Aslan Karatsev
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
91)
9
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
6
82%
(
47 of
57)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
44 of
55)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
25 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
28 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(7) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Radu Albot
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
14
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Tomas Machac Recent Matches Played
Before:
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Alex De Minaur
Player
Tomas Machac
53%
(
42 of
80)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
3-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Tomas Machac
Player
Sebastian Baez
53%
(
45 of
85)
1st Serve %
69%
(
54 of
78)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
38%
(
15 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
46%
(
39 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R4 | w/o | H2H | |||
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Tomas Machac
Player
Reilly Opelka
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
8
Aces
19
1
Double Faults
2
90%
(
35 of
39)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
34 of
44)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
10 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
19 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Tomas Machac
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
5
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
3
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
28 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Yosuke Watanuki
Player
Tomas Machac
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
24 of
30)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
45
Total Points Won
41
|
4-6 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Tomas Machac
Player
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
11
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
95%
(
37 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
12 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Tomas Machac
Player
Brandon Nakashima
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
53 of
83)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
28 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
83)
79
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Tomas Machac
Player
Learner Tien
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
83)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Tomas Machac
Player
Daniel Altmaier
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Where To Watch Rijthoven vs Machac?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Rijthoven Vs Machac is now available here.

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
62% (234/146) | Win/Loss | 66% (273/138) |
59% (523/364) | Sets Win/Loss | 64% (618/342) |
53% (4638/4187) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (4981/4065) |
0.62 | Aces Per Game | 0.4 |
2674 | Aces Total | 1762 |
0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
854 | Total Double Faults | 786 |
1:29:3 | Average Match Time | 1:36:1 |
491.62 | Average Opponent Rank | 335.16 |
63% (15413/24317) | 1st Serve % | 62% (17070/27569) |
75% (11587/15413) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (12095/17041) |
54% (4783/8904) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (5687/10525) |
39% (801/2060) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1248/2886) |
36% (9228/25428) | Return Points Win % | 40% (11464/28499) |
62% (227/366) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 70% (256/366) |
67% (4/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 52% (14/27) |
57% (99/173) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (88/149) |
59% (74/125) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (63/116) |
88% (227/199) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (274/241) |
12% (227/27) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (274/27) |
22% (153/34) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (136/31) |
Other Predictions
- Loading news...